Friday, June 17, 2016

Homily for the Sunday of the Fathers of Nicea 2016

As preached by Brother Christopher
Holy Wisdom Church


          Next week on Pentecost, for the first time in about 1200 years, the heads of the autocephalous Orthodox churches are scheduled to meet in Crete in a great and Holy Council. This has been in the planning for close to a hundred years; everyone in Orthodoxy knows and agrees in principal that it is desperately needed. And yet in recent months there are disturbing signs that all of the planning and hard work is once again going to fall short of of realization: the Church of Georgia stated recently that it could not sign one of the chief documents on relations with the non-Orthodox churches; just this past week the Church of Bulgaria said that it is not going to attend the Council at all, and the Antiochene Church has also threatened to boycott the event due to a jurisdictional dispute with the Patriarchate of Jerusalem over the Church in Qatar... there are even reports of heated disagreements over seating arrangements for the hierarchs that threaten the Council. It leaves one wondering if we shall ever get beyond the pettiness that has so often crippled Orthodox church life in recent centuries. Put cynically, “Where’s an emperor when you need him?” 

          All of this is strangely relevant to today’s celebration, when we honor the Fathers of the First Ecumenical Council that was held long ago at Nicea in 325. That Council was called by the Emperor Constantine and intended to establish clarity and unity in Christian doctrine and church life. The issues were far more contentious than those we’re carping about today: for example, whether Jesus was really one essence with the Father -- whether he was the Eternal Word incarnate, or whether he was, as Arius claimed, merely a magnificent creature, the nicest of guys. Those Fathers also came out with a common creed that expressed the essentials of Christian faith that have remained in place even to this day. Those hierarchs met in council together throughout that year, argued passionately for their beliefs and ultimately came to a common clarity of faith through dialogue and discernment. What would Orthodox Christian faith be without that initial Council? It leads one to wonder, “we claim that we are the Church of the Fathers. Yet how faithful to the spirit of those Fathers are the games we see being played out in advance of the coming Great and Holy Council?” We will have to wait and see whether the movement of the Spirit at Pentecost is able to rouse the Council set to meet in Crete, or whether we shall have to simply put up with more frustration and embarrassment as a Church that cannot seem to read the signs of the times as a true kairos moment. Lord have mercy! 

          In this morning’s gospel the high priest Caiaphas states, “You know nothing at all.  You do not understand that it is better to have one man die for the people than to have the whole nation destroyed.”  Caiaphas doesn’t realize the true import of what he has said: this passage has often been used to show that Jesus died for our sins. While that is true, unfortunately it has been understood in a toxic way -- particularly in the Christian West -- to reinforce an atonement theology grounded in substitution. Jesus is the one who dies in our stead. He is the scapegoat, the perfect victim who appeases the Divine anger for all of our sins. It is a strange concept: God requires Jesus to die on the cross to free the debt we owe, to pay the penalty for our own sin and disobedience. God demands payment, and so Jesus‘ sacrifice becomes a juridical transaction. If that’s what it means to be saved, then it turns God into something of a legalist. 

          But there is another way of looking at Jesus’ sacrifice that seems to me much more in harmony with the gospel. The salvation offered to us by Jesus is contingent on revealing just how completely, how unconditionally we are loved. Jesus was put to death because he preached a message that was at variance with the Jewish status quo. His was a true Gospel, good news, a message that revealed God’s kingdom as one of  inclusion, as open to all who repent. By challenging the hypocrisy, rigidity and narrowness of the scribes and Pharisees, Jesus angered them to such an extent that they conspired to put him to death. And they did. But Jesus on the cross reveals the extent that God will go to help us understand God’s limitless love for us. He will go even to the death. And that is just the mystery of Christ that Paul understood and was transformed by, that he speaks of in his letter to the Ephesians when he prays that we will have

the power to comprehend, with all the saints, what is the breadth and length and height and depth,  19 and to know the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge, so that you may be filled with all the fullness of God.


That is what the Fathers at Nicea were ultimately about, what they saw in Jesus and what they intended to pass on to us. Please God, may the Fathers at this coming Great and Holy Council be as faithful and vigilant as those who met at Nicea so long ago. 

Sermon 200 September 14, 2024 Jn 19:13-35, 1 Cor 1:17-28, Is 10:25-27, 11:10-12 Exaltation of the Cross

As preached by Brother Luke Holy Wisdom Church In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.      The cross is everywhere...